+6 items a day don't have a set price its a really unset price. On the other hand everyone knows +3 item a day jewel are 20m but you traded him 1m. 1m to 20m. If you wanted mark go get banned for getting 1/2 profit then maybe you should be banned too
We could begin breaking this down to the basics of economics. What's worth 20m to you might be worth nothing to me. The person on the other end on the trade has no issue with the trade. Only a few people who have been playing a while have an issue. The ban is for scamming, but does the other person think he's been scammed? He sure didn't seem to care to me. If anyone has the ability to appeal for his ban it's the other party in the trade.
We could begin breaking this down to the basics of economics. What's worth 20m to you might be worth nothing to me.
the fact is that % wise, crackas trade was worse. In terms of pure profit, marks trade was twice as worse. Do the math, crackas made 19mil profit and mark made 60mil profit. If mark didn't get banned then neither should crackas.
Quote from: aotonidas on February 09, 2014, 02:23:19 AMthe fact is that % wise, crackas trade was worse. In terms of pure profit, marks trade was twice as worse. Do the math, crackas made 19mil profit and mark made 60mil profit. If mark didn't get banned then neither should crackas.Those are two different jewels and it's been resolved, and by that logic, if I were to buy 9 gold bars and make a 3 billion profit (which isn't exactly possible) I shouldn't be banned because Mark wasn't? It's immoral. Even if his was twice as worse, Mark didn't rip off the guy as much as crackass did.
i'm beginning to assume it's less about the scamming and more about a personal grudge against crackas.
Too bad skoomers is not even a month old to the server and he has only seen crackas twice.
He's throwing a bunch of weightless statements into the argument. The solid cash vs percentage argument is a different side to the same coin. Shooting it down is just counter-productive to the argument.No one has yet to mention that crackas is using the item, not flipping it for profit as was Mark's intention.
In the +6 item per day jewel thread (seen here: http://moronyard.com/forums/index.php?topic=1793.0) where I myself was accused of scamming, nonSENSE comes out and says that underpaying or overpaying for an item is not an issue - but paying some atrocious price like 1 or 2m for a highly valued item in the community is clear grounds for ripping off another user, and would bring up the problem with him.