And the guy was happy with that trade... you're the one who has a problem because you didn't ask him for it sooner.
I would only have a problem with this if Master Mark completely ripped somebody off by offering a low amount like 2 mil. But 4 goldbars, seriously?
you can be mad all you want at me i dont really care what you think. so many people feel the same way about you and yet you still are around. i ask people thier price and pay thier price so everyone is happy.
, but stop trying to get the loyal members banned just because you dislike them.
It is posted in the rules that you can't scam someone. This isn't a scam, it is just underpaying someone. The person had the choice to refuse the trade, but didn't. Protect as many newbies as possible, but stop trying to get the loyal members banned just because you dislike them.
Quote from: crackas on February 09, 2014, 01:31:28 AMAnd the guy was happy with that trade... you're the one who has a problem because you didn't ask him for it sooner.We all have a problem with it because it's unethical and immoral. This was brought up with Mark and with the commotion you did it yourself. GG.
The fact remains that the user that traded for 1m was happy with his trade. You're speaking for someone that doesn't care. He made no attempt to make him feel like it was a worthless jewel. He offered 1M for the jewel, The other party accepted 1M for the jewel. Mark was just under the same fire for underpaying for his +6, where exactly does the line fall?
In the +6 item per day jewel thread (seen here: http://moronyard.com/forums/index.php?topic=1793.0) where I myself was accused of scamming, nonSENSE comes out and says that underpaying or overpaying for an item is not an issue - but paying some atrocious price like 1 or 2m for a highly valued item in the community is clear grounds for ripping off another user, and would bring up the problem with him.
Mark was just under the same fire for underpaying for his +6, where exactly does the line fall?